Efficiency table:
 
70 GeV  75 GeV  80 GeV 85 GeV 90 GeV 92.5 GeV 95 GeV 97.5 GeV
Pres. 74.16 73.87 73.75 74.93 75.72 75.22 77.71±0.76 76.52
El. id.  63.85 63.66 62.98 63.08 65.11 64.28 66.90±0.86  65.81
El.en..  61.09 60.51 59.92 60.11 62.08 61.07 63.23±0.88 61.74
Fit.prob  54.03 55.26 55.61 55.21 57.57 56.94 58.66±0.90 56.97
Isol..  52.78 53.30 54.01 53.54 55.47 54.97 56.69±0.91 54.80
Mass.  47.87 52.50 53.81 53.30 55.37 54.94 56.56±0.91 54.70
B tag.  44.82 49.35 50.55 50.10 51.27 51.03 52.92±0.91 50.80

For comparison: eff. before b.tag  in previous analysis: 54.% at 90 GeV, 55.8% at 95 GeV

2D plots

From real events,  3 are background -like
The last in high mass region - a few data

4C fit Mjet=107.2 GeV    4C fit Mee= 56 .4 GeV   fit prob: 1.39067e-06
5C fit Mjet= 104.9 GeV   5C fit Mee=  59.5 GeV   fit prob: 1.16108e-07
Electron 1: "our" energy 42.2 GeV; cal. em.energy 50.5 GeV theta 21.40 isol. 76.10
Electron 2: "our" energy 17.5 GeV ; cal. em.energy 8.2 GeV theta 149.80 isol. 10.70
B tag: global 1.82347; min(probp,probs)=1.59378e-09

NO SERIUOS CANDIDATE!